Nothing is known of his parentage. Though Cornelius was the name of a noble Roman family, there is no proof that he was descended from the Roman aristocracy; provincial families often took the name of the governor who had given them Roman citizenship.
His Annals provide us with a single reference to Jesus of considerable value. Rather frustratingly, much of his work has been lost, including a work which covers the yearswhere the trial of Jesus would have been had he recorded it [Meie. Here is a full quote of the cite of our concern, from Annals Jesus and the Christians are mentioned in an account of how the Emperor Nero went after Christians in order to draw attention away from himself after Rome's fire of 64 AD: But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the Bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements Which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero From the infamy of being believed to have ordered the Conflagration, the fire of Rome.
Hence to suppress the rumor, he Falsely charged with the guilt, and punished Christians, who were Hated for their enormities. Accordingly, an arrest was first Made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an Immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of Firing the city, as of hatred against mankind.
A survey of the literature indicates that this citation by Tacitus has not been given enough regard, having often been overshadowed by the citations in Josephus see next entry. Respected Christian scholar R. France, for example, does not believe that the Tacitus passage provides sufficient independent testimony for the existence of Jesus [Franc.
EvJ, 23] and agrees with G. Wells that the citation is of little value. It is unfortunate that France so readily agreed with Wells' assessment.
An investigation into the methods and background of Tacitus, as reported by Tacitean scholars whose works, incidentally, France does not consulttells us that this is an extremely reliable reference to Jesus and for early Christianity.
Is this a genuine reference, or are there doubts about its veracity? Very few would assert that this passage is a forgery [though see Cutn. JGMM, ], for the evidence is strongly in favor of the genuineness of this passage. The passage is in perfect Tacitean style; it appears in every known copy of the Annals although there are very few copies of it, and none dates earlier than the 11th centuryand the anti-Christian tone is so strong that it is extremely unlikely that a Christian could have written it.
Indeed, the Tacitean polemic against Christianity is so strong that it was one of two things Tacitus was condemned for in the sixteenth century - the other being that he wrote in bad Latin [Dor. Tac, ], and it is even said that Spinoza liked Tacitus because of his anti-Jewish and anti-Christian bias [Momig.
This is not to say that there are not those whom we may encounter who will suggest that this passage is an interpolation. Some will suggest that because no church father quotes the passage early in church history, it must have been added later.
|Browse Articles||His portraits of the famous and the infamous, especially during the early years of the Roman Empire, are among the most vivid and influential descriptions in all Roman literature. Neither the exact date of his birth nor that of his death is known.|
|Livy’s historical approach||AD 56 — ca.|
|Official Career||His Annals provide us with a single reference to Jesus of considerable value. Rather frustratingly, much of his work has been lost, including a work which covers the yearswhere the trial of Jesus would have been had he recorded it [Meie.|
|Tacitus - Wikipedia||Though most has been lost, what remains is an invaluable record of the era.|
|Upcoming Events||His portraits of the famous and the infamous, especially during the early years of the Roman Empire, are among the most vivid and influential descriptions in all Roman literature.|
No church father, however, would have willingly quoted such a negative reference to Jesus and the Christians; moreover, indications are that Tacitus wrote for a very limited audience of his peers.
The Annals may not have gotten into the Church's hands at an early date. So, the idea that this passage is an interpolation is no more credible than the idea held in the 19th century that Tacitus' entire works are fifteenth-century forgeries. Is there good reason to trust what they say?
The answer here is: The Tacitean literature is full of praise for the accuracy, care, critical capability, and trustworthiness of the work of Tacitus, and it is singularly unfortunate that many writers in this subject area have failed to appreciate this!
Let's look at a number of quotes from scholars in the Tacitean camp: Syme, who was regarded as one of the foremost Tacitean scholars, says [Sym.The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Christ, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written ca.
AD ), book 15, chapter Tacitus took the first step in the cursus honorem, or the Roman civil service, in 82, when he was chosen a quaestor. He was one of twenty young men who for a year had the opportunity to prove.
Tacitus was a Roman historian writing early in the 2nd century A.D. His Annals provide us with a single reference to Jesus of considerable value.
Rather frustratingly, much of his work has been lost, including a work which covers the years , where the trial of Jesus would have been had he recorded it [heartoftexashop.com, 89]. Tacitus (55/ ca CE) was an ancient Roman statesman and writer, notable for his mastery of prose and methodical approach to history.
After rising through the ranks of the Roman government. Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus (ca. AD 56 – ca. AD ) was a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire.
The surviving portions of his two major works—the Annals and the Histories—examine the reigns of the Roman Emperors Tiberius, Claudius, Nero and those who reigned in the Year of the Four Emperors.4/5(). Tacitus took the first step in the cursus honorem, or the Roman civil service, in 82, when he was chosen a quaestor.
He was one of twenty young men who for a year had the opportunity to prove.